Mathematics is not a careful march down a well-cleared highway, but a journey into a strange wilderness, where the explorers often get lost, – W.S. Anglin.
Step 1. Magnitude and Argument:
|z| = $\sqrt{1² +(\sqrt{3})²} = 2, Arg(z) = arctan(\sqrt{3}) = \frac{∏}{3}$. Thus, the polar for of z is $z = 2e^{\frac{\pi}{3}i}$
Step 2. Calculating the Principal Fourth Root:
To find $z^{\frac{1}{n}}$, we use De Moivre’s Theorem, which states that for any complex number z = re iθ, its n-th roots are given by: $z^{\frac{1}{n}} = r^{\frac{1}{n}}e^{i(\frac{θ+2\pi k}{n})}$, k = 0, 1, 2, …, n − 1. For the principal (or primary) fourth root (k = 0, n = 4):
$z^{\frac{1}{4}} = (2e^{\frac{\pi}{3}i})^{\frac{1}{4}} = 2^{\frac{1}{4}}e^{\frac{\pi}{3∙4}i}= \sqrt[4]{2}e^{\frac{\pi}{12}i}$
Step 3. Finding All Fourth Roots:
Alternatively, $z^{\frac{1}{n}} = r^{\frac{1}{n}}e^{i(\frac{θ+2\pi k}{n})} = r^{\frac{1}{n}}e^{i(\frac{θ}{n})}e^{i(\frac{2\pi k}{n})}$. $w_n = e^{i(\frac{2\pi}{n})}, \sqrt[n]{w} = \sqrt[n]{|w|}e^{i\frac{Arg(w)}{n}}$. To find all four fourth roots of z, $w^{\frac{1}{n}} = ${$r^{\frac{1}{n}}\sqrt[n]{w}, r^{\frac{1}{n}}w_n\sqrt[n]{w}, r^{\frac{1}{n}}w_n²\sqrt[n]{w}, …, r^{\frac{1}{n}}w_n^{n-1}\sqrt[n]{w}$} =[ n = 4] {$r^{\frac{1}{4}}\sqrt[4]{w}, r^{\frac{1}{4}}w_4\sqrt[4]{w}, r^{\frac{1}{4}}w_n²\sqrt[4]{w}, r^{\frac{1}{4}}w_n^{3}\sqrt[4]{w}$}
n = 4, $w_4 = i = e^{\frac{\pi}{2}i} = e^{\frac{6\pi}{12}i}$
Therefore, the four fourth roots of z are: $z^{\frac{1}{4}} =$ {$\sqrt[4]{2}e^{\frac{\pi}{12}i}, \sqrt[4]{2}e^{\frac{7\pi}{12}i}, \sqrt[4]{2}e^{\frac{13\pi}{12}i}, \sqrt[4]{2}e^{\frac{19\pi}{12}i}$} It’s often helpful to visualize the roots on the complex plane. Each fourth root lies at an angle of π/12, 7π/12, 13π/12, and 19π/12 radians from the positive real axis, each spaced π/2 radians apart (i.e., 90 degrees).
The rule $\sqrt{a}∗\sqrt{b}=\sqrt{ab}$ is only valid when at least one of a or b is a non-negative real number. The error is in the illicit application of the rule for multiplying square roots to negative numbers.
Definition. Let D ⊆ ℂ be a set of complex numbers. A complex valued function f of a complex variable, defined on D, is a rule that assigns a unique complex number w to each complex number z belonging to the set D, f: D ➞ ℂ. The set D is in the definition is called the domain of the complex function f. The set {f(z): z ∈ D} is called the range of the complex function. D = Dom(f), and the range of f is f(D).
We often called the elements of D as points. If z ∈ D, then f(z) is called the image of the point z under f. f: D ➞ ℂ means that f is a complex function with domain D.
Some examples are:
Constant functions: $f: \Complex \rarr \Complex$ given by f(z) = c where z is a constant.
Polynomial functions: $f: \Complex \rarr \Complex$ defined by f(z) = $a_nz^n + a_{n-1}z^{n-1} + ··· + a_0$ where n is a non-negative integer, an, an-1, ··· , a0 are complex constants, an ≠ 0, e.g., f(z) = 6z² -(2+4i)z + 12 -$\sqrt{3}i$. The hightest prior of z carrying a non-zero coefficient is 2, so we say that f is a second degree polynomial.
Rational functions. Let p(z) and q(z) be polynomial functions where q(z) = 0. Then, $\frac{p(z)}{q(z)}$ is called a rational function. The domain of f is the set {z ∈ ℂ : q(z) ≠ 0}, e.g., f(z) = $\frac{az+b}{cz+d}$ where a, b, c, d ∈ ℂ, b and d are not both zeroes is a rational function. f is called a linear fractional transformation. $Domain(f) = \begin{cases} ℂ -{\frac{-d}{c}}, &c ≠ 0 \\ ℂ, &c = 0 ~, (d ≠ 0) \end{cases}$
Example: $g(z) = \frac{3z²-(2+i)z}{2z -3i}$ for each z ∈ ℂ - {$\frac{3i}{2}$}
Let f(z) = z3 ∀z ∈ ℂ, f(x + iy) = x³ -3xy² + i(3x²y -y³).
We will call x³ -3xy² to be the real part of f and 3x²y -y³ to be the imaginary part of f.
In general f, $f: D \rarr \Complex$ is a function, f(x, y) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) ∀x + iy ∈ D, the u(x, y) is called the real part of f and v(x, y) is called the imaginary part.
D ⊆ ℂ. If D is thought of as a subset of ℝ², then $u: D ⊆ ℂ \rarr \Complex \text{ and } v: D ⊆ ℂ \rarr \Complex$ are real valued functions of two real variables.
We can restrict D to be B(0; 1) ⊆ ℂ and write f: B(0, 1) → ℂ given by f(z) = z2. This complex function f is a restriction of the original function defined on all of ℂ.
$g(z) = \frac{z -1}{iz²} \forall z \in \Complex \minus$ {0}
f(z) = z3, f(x +iy) = (x +iy)3 = $x³+3x²(iy)+3x(iy)²+(iy)³ = x³-3xy²+i(3x²y-y³)$ where $u = x³-3xy², v = 3x²y-y³$
If more than one value of w corresponds to each value of z, e.g, f(z) = $z^{\frac{1}{2}}$ we say that is not a function or is a multiple-valued function.
Is f invertible? If not, how can we restrict its domain to make it injective (one-to-one) f|D
If z = x + iy the exponential function ez, exp: $\mathbb{C} → \mathbb{C}$ may be defined in many equivalent ways:
excos(x) + exsin(y)i where u = excos(x), v = exsin(y), and |z| = |ez| = |exeiy| = |ex|∙|eiy| =[eiy is a point on the unit circle in the complex plane, $|e^{iy}| = |cos(y) + isin(iy)| = \sqrt{cos²(y)+sin²(y)} = 1$, ex ≥ 0 ∀ x] ex∙1 = ex
arg(ez) = y + 2nπ (n = 0, ±1, ±2, …). Re(ez) = excos(y), Im(ez) = exsin(y)
For a complex number z = x + yi, the complex logarithm is defined as: Log(z) = ln(|z|) + i * Arg(z) where:
Dom(Log(z)) = ℂ*, meaning it encompasses all complex numbers except for zero. This is because the logarithm is undefined at z=0. This definition ensures that exp(Log(z)) = z. The principal value is chosen to keep the argument within (-π, π], e.g. For z = 1 + i, |z| = √(1² + 1²) = √2, Arg(z) = arctan(1/1) = π/4, Log(z) = ln(√2) + i * (π/4)
log(z) = ln(|z|) + i * arg(z) where:
It’s a multi-valued function due to the periodic nature of the argument because arg(z) can take multiple values differing by 2πk, where k is any integer. This means for any complex number z, there are infinitely many complex logarithms that differ by multiples of 2πi, e.g, for z = 1 + i: log(z) = ln(√2) + i * (π/4 + 2πk).
Expanding the complex exponential functions eiz = cos(z) + isin(z), e-iz = cos(z) - isin(z). Adding, subtracting and multiplying these two formulae give respectively the two Euler’s formulae:
$cos(z) = \frac{1}{2}(e^{iz}+e^{-iz}), sin(z) = \frac{1}{2i}(e^{iz}-e^{-iz}), cosh(z) = \frac{1}{2}(e^{z}+e^{-z}), sinh(z) = \frac{1}{2}(e^{z}-e^{-z})$
$sinh(z) =[\text{By definition}] \frac{1}{2}(e^{z}-e^{-z}) = \frac{1}{2}(e^{x+iy}-e^{-(x+iy)}) = \frac{1}{2}[(e^{x}e^{iy})-(e^{-x}e^{-iy}) ] =[\text{Using Euler’s formula}] \frac{1}{2}[e^{x}cos(y)+e^{x}isin(y)-cos(y)e^{-x}+isin(y)e^{-x}]= cos(y)(\frac{1}{2}[e^{x}-e^{-x}]) + sin(y)(\frac{i}{2i}[e^{x}+e^{-x}]) = \frac{1}{2}[e^{x}-e^{-x}]cos(y)+i\frac{1}{2}[e^{x}+e^{-x}]sin(y) = sinh(x)cos(y)+icosh(x)sin(y)$, hence u = sinh(x)cos(y) and v = cosh(x)sin(y)
If y = 0, meaning z is a real number, $sinh(z) = sinh(x)cos(y)+icosh(x)sin(y) = sinh(x)∙1+icosh(x)∙ 0 = sinh(x)$. This last mathematical statement clearly demonstrates how the complex hyperbolic sine function reduces to the real hyperbolic sine function for real arguments. If x = 0, meaning z is a pure imaginary, $sinh(z) = sinh(iy) = sinh(x)cos(y)+icosh(x)sin(y) =[\text{Since sinh(0) = 0 and cosh(0) = 1, this simplifies to}] isin(y)$
$cosh(z) =[\text{By definition}] \frac{1}{2}(e^{z}+e^{-z}) = \frac{1}{2}(e^{x+iy}+e^{-(x+iy)}) = \frac{1}{2}[(e^{x}e^{iy})+(e^{-x}e^{-iy}) ] =[\text{Using Euler’s formula}] \frac{1}{2}[e^{x}cos(y)+e^{x}isin(y)+cos(y)e^{-x}-isin(y)e^{-x}]= cos(y)(\frac{1}{2}[e^{x}+e^{-x}]) + sin(y)(\frac{i}{2i}[e^{x}-e^{-x}]) = \frac{1}{2}[e^{x}+e^{-x}]cos(y)+i\frac{1}{2}[e^{x}-e^{-x}]sin(y) = cosh(x)cos(y)+isinh(x)sin(y)$, hence u = cosh(x)cos(y) and v = sinh(x)sin(y)
If y = 0, meaning z is a real number, $cosh(z) = cosh(x)cos(y)+isinh(x)sin(y) = cosh(x)∙1+isinh(x)∙0 = cosh(x)$. This last mathematical statement clearly demonstrates how the complex hyperbolic cosine function reduces to the real hyperbolic cosine function for real arguments. If x = 0, meaning z is a pure imaginary, $cosh(z) = cosh(iy) = cosh(x)cos(y)+isinh(x)sin(y) =[\text{Since sinh(0) = 0 and cosh(0) = 1, this simplifies to}] cos(y)$. Therefore, the hyperbolic cosine of a purely imaginary number is equal to the cosine of the real part of the imaginary number.
In summary:
Another way of calculating the complex cosine function: cos(z) = cos(x + iy) =[Using the formula for the cosine of a sum: cos(a+b) = cos(a)cos(b) − sin(a)sin(b)] cos(x)cos(iy) -sin(x)sin(iy) =[cos(iy) = (ei(iy) + e-i(iy)) / 2 = (e-y + ey) / 2 = cosh(y); sin(iy) = (ei(iy) - e-i(iy)) / 2i = (e-y - ey) / 2i = i(ey - e-y) / 2 = i sinh(y)] cos(x)cosh(y) -isin(x)sinh(y). Therefore, cos(z) = cos(x + iy) = cos(x)cosh(y) -isin(x)sinh(y)
$tan(z) = \frac{sin(z)}{cos(z)}, sec(z) = \frac{1}{cos(z)}$
The following properties are satisfied:
The addition formulae may be written also as sin(x + iy) =[$sin(z_1+z_2) = sin(z_1)cos(z_2) + cos(z_1)sin(z_2)$] sin(x)cos(iy) + cos(x)sin(iy) = sin(x)cosh(y)+icos(x)sinh(y). |sin(x + iy)| = $\sqrt{sin²(x)cosh²(y)+cos²(x)sinh²(y)}$ = [cos2 -sin2 = 1] $\sqrt{sin²(x)cosh²(y) + (1-sin²(x))sinh²(y)} = \sqrt{sin²(x)(cosh²(y)-sin²(x)) + sinh²(y)} =$ [cosh2(y) -sin2(y) = 1] $\sqrt{sin²(x) + sinh²(y)}$